If Egypt Had Our Immigration Policies in 0 AD.

Is This What We Want?

The story is here.  (In a nutshell, a 23 YO DACA recipient was sent to jail. No criminal record.)

I'd ask "Is this what we want?" But I know the answer. Most people will say "Of course not." But all my Trump friends, even the Christians (especially the Christians) will say "Hey, what part of illegal don't you understand?" Or "Obama did worse." Or hopefully they at least say "I don't like this, but I really like Trump's policies." Or something. Some may think, but won't say "She's a foreigner, we don't need her." Or "I'll bet Spanish is her first language." Or "She's brown, she doesn't belong here."

She was brought here when she was 10. (So of course it's her fault?) But she's here, high school diploma, working jobs, no criminal record. She pays taxes. But she didn't renew her DACA because she was scared that would draw attention to herself (can you blame her?)

(Not that it matters, but I would love for someone to just once ask Trump what DACA stands for. Guessing he doesn't know.)

You can think what you want, but this kind of crap makes me sick. I never thought Americans were like this. We're the "melting pot." We take your "tired, your pour, your huddled masses, yearning to be free." But not any more. And it turns out, it's not just Trump, it's many of my friends too.

I'm sure you all realize, though, that if Egypt had immigration policies like we do, Herod would have killed Jesus before he was 2. (And yes, I know that God would have protected him. But apparently He doesn't protect this woman.) Sorry if that makes you uncomfortable, but it's true.

And of course, this is just one of hundreds. It's not isolated. This is what we get from having Stephen Miller, a white supremacist, telling Trump what to do. Honestly, on his own, I don't think Trump would do this. But he's really too wishy-washy to come up with his own policies. So he does whatever is cruelest I guess. Honestly, I'm not sure what his standards are. I know empathy and common sense don't make the cut.

Yeah, but I'm just a libtard snowflake. What do I know?

The War on Christmas!!??

Really, I thought we were past that. But no, recently I’ve seen a number of people on social media protesting how they can now say “Merry Christmas” and all the lefties say “Happy Holidays.”

Really? Really? Do they honestly believe that?

Obama had Christmas Trees every year, and he called them that. There has never been any federal law about saying “Merry Christmas.” Every single Christian (and many non-Christians) I know, R or D, have said “Merry Christmas” forever.

Yet some people are convinced that there’s a “War on Christmas.” I’m sorry to say this, but if you believe that, you’re very misguided.

Every year about this time, people on the right trot this out. Because they know that all the people on social media will complain about it, and get them mad at “the Godless Left” all over again. That’s all this is about. It’s about division and hatred. Yet those who believe in this “War” are often the first to complain about how we’re so divided.

You know who does say “Happy Holidays?” Mostly, it’s businesses. (You know, those far-left CEO’s !!!) And they say it because they are trying to include as many people as possible. They want to welcome Christians, but also Muslims, Jews, Buddhists, atheists, etc. Because they want to make as much money as possible.

But actually the real problem is that conservatives have a completely erroneous vision of what progressives are. They honestly believe that liberals are God-hating, baby-killing, freedom-hating, tax-loving, police-hating, socialists. Well, that's not us. But that’s a discussion for another day.

So go ahead and say “Merry Christmas.” Or “Happy Holidays.” Or whatever you want. And don’t get so offended when someone says something different.

I Will Not Shut Up

"We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented."

I think of this quote quite a bit. It’s by Elie Wiesel, a Romanian born holocaust survivor.

I think he’s right. When we see injustice, oppression, evil, or authoritarianism, it is important to take sides. And to act, I believe. As he implies, even if you are on the side of right, if you’re silent, you’re encouraging the tormentor.

Having said that, I know many people take that road. And that’s OK I guess. You have to do what is best for you. However, you have to realize that it is a measure of your privilege that you can ignore injustice and still be fine. Because you’re not the one being oppressed. At least, not yet.

But I won’t do that. Whether you agree or not, I see a lot of terrifying things taking place in our government right now. Of course it’s not Hitler or the holocaust. On the other hand, Hitler wasn’t like that in 1933 either. He became what he was, because good people allowed it to happen.

As an ordinary citizen, my options are limited. I can vote, which I do. I can protest, although most protests are miles away. I can donate to causes I believe in, which I also do.

But also what I can do is speak out. Or more specifically, write. If I wrote for a national news outlet, I’d have an audience, and maybe I could make a difference. But I don’t. If I could write like John Pavlovitz that would help too. He is so good, he has gained a national audience just from his writing.

But I’m not well known, and I’m not that good of a writer. So my outlet is mostly social media. If you’ve followed me, you’ll see that I don’t normally rant, scream, call people names, or try to shame them. At least I try not to--I don’t always succeed.

But I do my best. I support what I think America needs. And I protest that which I think is harmful. If you disagree, that’s fine. Engage me if you want. I may not respond, but if I do, I’ll do my best to keep it civil.

And if you don’t want to see me “rant” on social media, then I strongly urge you to unfriend me or block me right now. I honestly won’t be upset, even if you’re a real-life friend of mine. I completely understand. Not everyone needs more drama in their lives.

But I won't remain silent. Probably nothing I say will change any minds or make any difference. But I have to try. I want to be able to say that when I saw wrong, I wasn’t silent. That I tried to make a difference. Feel free to roll your eyes, tell me to get a life, think of me as a crazy old man, deluded, self-important, melodramatic, whatever. That’s fine. Maybe you're right. But I have to do what I can.

So really, unfriend, unfollow, or block me right now. And if you don’t, don’t complain about what I’m saying.

Five Best Sentences

I’ve seen the accompanying meme quite a bit recently. Those posting it mean well, but it is full of inaccuracies and misleading sentiments. So while I know they didn't ask for responses, I just couldn’t let them go. My thoughts for each of them, in order...

1) Nobody is talking about legislating anyone out of prosperity. Even Warren's wealth tax, probably the most progressive out there, doesn't kick in until someone has over 50 million dollars. And it is only 2%. For the billionaire, it goes up to 6%. But the first 50 million isn’t touched. That won't be "legislating the wealthy out of prosperity."

2) This point makes the assumption that we're going to take money from people who work hard and give it to lazy people who don't want to work. But most people who are in poverty are already working. But even a full time job can't support a family of four anymore. The implication is that rich people are rich because they work hard, and poor people are poor because they're lazy. But you can bust your ass working full time at many jobs and still be in poverty.

3) Do you really think that rich people haven't "taken from somebody else?" The Walmart family are all billionaires, yet many Walmart employees, even full time ones, live in poverty. Seems to me that those rich people are getting rich off the backs of the workers.

4) Actually, you can. When a poor person gets more money, he spends it on material things because he has no choice. More people spending money means more consumption, more consumption means more jobs, more jobs means more income. And yes, more income means more wealth.

5) Very few people just don't work because they don't want to. Yes, there are some of course. But there are also a lot of very rich people who don't work either. Most of the people who could really benefit by higher taxes on the wealthy are already working. Most of them work very hard, yet they can't make ends meet, let alone get ahead. Think of the store clerk, the waitress, the social worker, the EMT, the laborer, the maid, the stock boy, the home healthcare worker, the busboy, or the teacher's aid. ALL of them work very hard, yet none of them are even close to wealthy.

6) I'm going to add one more. Although it's a common conservative talking point, almost nobody is suggesting socialism. (No, not even Bernie Sanders.) What people are asking for is a more equitable system mostly by higher taxes on those who can afford it. Even then, the tax rates suggested are lower than during the Eisenhower administration, when the top marginal rate was over 90%. America was just fine then. We still had rich people. But even the normal laborer could support a family of four on one income. Is that really such a racial idea?

7) What the heck, still one more. As long as the rich people have low or moderate income people preaching their message, nothing will change. I can guarantee that many people who echo the sentiments in the accompanying  post are decent people who struggle to make ends meet. Yet they trumpet this stuff, and the rich people laugh all the way to the bank. And the hard workers stay poor.

Treat the Janitor the Same as the CEO.

I’ve seen that sentiment quite often, mostly on social media. It’s put out by people who claim that the janitor, or any other hourly employee performing a seemingly menial task, should be treated by the general public the same as a CEO, or presumably any other rich guy. It’s meant to show equality. Or something.

Those saying it are showing how “fair” they are. But I don’t buy it. Because honestly, almost nobody really does it.

How about the people who have lately been posting things about Colin Kaepernick serving burgers at McDonald’s. Or something similar. Forgetting what you think about Keapernick, the obvious take is that working at McDonald’s is somehow not important, or not respectable. Yet I know some of these same people have also posted about the CEO/janitor idea.

Or how about the people complaining about a $15/hour minimum wage? The usual take is (again, McDonald’s) something like: Flipping burgers should give you $15/hour?

Or the people who make fun of Walmart employees, saying they can be replaced by an automated checkout.

Ask yourself this: If you meet a CEO, or a member of congress, or a high ranking official of any type, how do you address him or her? Sir? Ma’am? Or something similar? Probably.

Now ask yourself this: If you engage with a stock boy at Walmart, or a sales associate at Home Depot, or maybe a bartender, or a server, or a checkout person, or a receptionist: do you call them sir? Ma’am? Any label of importance? Probably not.

But  you should. Not everyone can be a CEO. Not everyone can be rich. For some of us, a custodian at Walmart is the best we can do. And we shouldn’t be ashamed of it. Any job, performed with dignity, effort, and dedication, deserves our respect. And you shouldn’t ridicule it.

Next time you ask for help at Lowe’s, be aware of how you address that person. Do you use a term of respect, such as “sir?” If not, then honestly, just admit you don’t think they’re important.

No matter what you post on Facebook.

Socks

Yesterday was Thanksgiving. I thought about what I was grateful for. And of course, I have it pretty good. I am grateful for a lot of things.

But one thing I've been thinking about lately: socks. Yes really. Each year around this time, Jeanne buys me a dozen new socks. This year it was a “14 for the price of 12!” package, so I got extra. She buys them when mowing season is about over, and I try to make them last until the same time next year. I was trying to make it to Christmas, but I was down to 3 pairs that didn’t have holes, so she decided I couldn’t wait.

You know, socks are no big deal. I think the package cost about $12 or so, not sure. I can buy new socks any time I want. I don’t HAVE to wait a whole year, but I do.

But they are “no big deal” because I have it well. There are many people in the world who would be pretty pleased to get a few pairs of new socks, because that’s something they don’t have enough of.

And you know, it doesn’t have to be this way. We have enough wealth in this world that everyone should be able to have socks. Really. Even if they’re from another country. Or if they’re a different color. Or they’re a refugee. Or an immigrant. Or an asylum seeker. Or from a poor country. Or from a totalitarian country. Or from the wrong side of town. Or if they are children with really worthless parents. Or if they’re drug addicts. Or if they’re mentally handicapped. Or...everything.

Or to put it a different way--if Jeff Bezos, one single person, gave up just 25% of his wealth, we could buy 4 pairs of socks for every single human on the planet. Yes, I understand the logistics involved, but you get the idea. And by the way, he’d still have about $80 Billion left. Yeah.

I don’t know the solution, but I know what we’re doing now is wrong. And we don't seem to care enough to fix it--yet.

Why Have Intelligence If We Don't Use It?

A few days ago, the "Worldwide Threat Assessment" was released by American intelligence agencies. Along with that, the chiefs of these agencies (FBI, CIA, NSA, and others) testified before the Senate. Among other things, they said :

1) ISIS is not defeated, and is still a threat.

2) North Korea is still a threat, and is NOT giving up its nuclear weapons.

3) There is NO security crisis at the southern border.

4) Iran is NOT attempting to build a nuclear weapon.

5) Russia is still attempting "information warfare" mostly through social media, to influence our elections.

6) Climate change IS causing possible security challenges.

ALL of these positions are in direct contrast to what the President believes.

President Trump's response (on Twitter, of course) was to openly mock his own chiefs, all of whom were appointed by him. He says basically that they're wrong, and he's right. (bottom tweet is first)

Which brings to mind one important question: where does he get his information?

He likes to say he just has a "gut feeling" about these things. I'm sorry, but "gut" is not data. Unless you're psychic, you can't just "know" things. So where DOES he get his information?

I don't know, but the problem is, nobody else knows either. Of course, the conspiracy theorists among us would say that his "gut" feelings are actually those represented by some other countries: Russia, Saudi Arabia, and others. Or maybe he gets his intelligence briefings from "Fox and Friends" which unfortunately, is very likely. Or maybe he just makes shit up. That's likely, as well. Or it could be that he's just not very bright, and can't understand this stuff.

But no matter what, can't we all agree that a president who completely ignores his spy agencies is a danger? Can't we all acknowledge that? 

Sadly, the answer is "no." The rabid Trump supporters will not acknowledge this. Many of them just assume the President is always right, no matter what. Probably most aren't even aware of his disconnect with his intelligence agencies, because I doubt if Fox News dwells on it.

I've been told that the only reason some of us are against Trump is because Hillary lost, Trump won, and we should just get over it. You couldn't be further from the truth. Things like this are why I'm against Trump, and why I think he's a danger to our country.

And I'm pretty sure most of the agency chiefs at the hearing yesterday would agree with me.

You Can’t Vote “Yes.”

I watched, or listened to, most of the hearings today. Of course, those of you who know me, know I lean progressive. So I was biased against Kavanaugh from the start.  I’ll admit that. And while I could give you a million reasons why I thought he was disgusting, I won’t. Because I have to admit, my take on him is biased. And some of you would disagree, of course.

The republicans kept blasting the democrats for playing politics. Maybe Feinstein sat on the letter. While she explained it, just for the sake of argument, let’s say they were completely partisan and biased. Even if they were, that’s not the point. Vote them out, or schedule hearings to expose their crookedness. But the hearing today is not about them, it's about the Supreme Court.

And the real point is simple: Will Brett Kavanaugh be a fair and unbiased judge on the Supreme Court? There are three reasons why, if I were a senator, I could not vote “yes.” And I believe these are factual, not my impressions.

1) In his opening remarks, and throughout the hearing, he continually blasted “the left.” Over and over. If he really feels that way, how unbiased will he be the next time a case comes before him where a progressive idea is challenging a conservative one? And if you’re a republican reading this, imagine how you would feel if a SC justice continually blasted “the right.” You would say it’s unfair, and it would be. And so is this.

2) He may or may not have committed the sexual assault. I believe he did, but of course I can’t prove it. But he clearly lied. Many times. Maybe you don't care if we was a cad in high school. But then he should at least admit to that. Just for fun, google “Devils’ Triangle” or “boof.” They don’t mean what he said they mean. His explanation of the FFFFFFFourth of July was simply not believable. And the Renate Alumnius? Do you believe his explanation? I don’t.

3) But it doesn’t matter what I believe. If there WERE an FBI investigation, it wouldn’t have to come down to a “he said/she said.” They could ask his classmates what those terms meant. They could find out what was the significance of the July 1 meeting about “skis.” They could grill Mark Judge to see what he knew. Yet 9 times he refused to encourage the FBI to investigate. If they did, I wonder what they would find. Now, it may be that the FBI would turn up nothing, and he was completely truthful. If that were the case, the vote would be completely different. But until that investigation takes place, and until we find out if he is lying, my vote would have to be “no.”

Because maybe you don’t care about what he did in high school. But if he’s lying, he’s lying NOW. And the Supreme Court is no place for a proven liar.

It Should Have Been Easy

I watched the Putin-Trump press conference today. And as one of the pundits said “A lot of people will remember where they were when they saw this.” Yeah, believe it or not, I will. It somehow seems that important.

Because the big reaction to this press conference came from a couple questions asked by American reporters. They were both very good questions. Really. But each of them really set up a softball for Trump. All he had to do was take it. But he didn’t.

Here’s the first question, from Jeff Mason of Reuters:

QUESTION: Thank you. Mr. President, you tweeted this morning that it's U.S. foolishness, stupidity and the Mueller probe that is responsible for the decline in U.S. relations with Russia. Do you hold Russia at all accountable for anything in particular? And if so, what would you -- what would you consider them -- that they are responsible for?

It should have been easy. All the President had to say was something like “Of course. They are suspected of a lot of really bad things, horrible things, that you’ve all read about. These things are contrary to what Americans value, so this has really hurt our relationship. But still, I think we have to get past that, and look to the future.”

See how easy that was? He didn’t even have to name the things, like: shooting down passenger airliners, killing journalists, jailing political opponents, meddling with our elections. He could have kept it very general, then it could easily have been spun as Trump being tough on Putin. And all would have been fine for him.

But he didn’t do anything like that. What did he say? Here it is:

TRUMP: Yes I do. I hold both countries responsible. I think that the United States has been foolish. I think we've all been foolish.

“Both sides.” Of course…

The other question, from Jonathan Lemir of the AP, was this:

QUESTION: Thank you. A question for each president; President Trump, you first. Just now, President Putin denied having anything to do with the election interference in 2016. Every U.S. intelligence agency has concluded that Russia did. What -- who -- my first question for you, sir, is who do you believe? My second question is would you now, with the whole world watching, tell President Putin, would you denounce what happened in 2016 and would you warn him to never do it again?

Again, it should have been easy. Something like: “Of course I believe my intelligence community. And as I told  him in our meeting, this is unacceptable to the US, and it has to stop--now. There is no place in our relationship for this.”

See how easy it was? He could even have told Putin ahead of time something like “I may have to hit you hard on a few things, just to save face, but I don’t really mean it.”

But he didn’t do that. Here’s his answer.

TRUMP: So let me just say that we have two thoughts. You have groups that are wondering why the FBI never took the server -- haven't they taken the server. Why was the FBI told to leave the office of the Democratic National Committee? I've been wondering that, I've been asking that for months and months and I've been tweeting it out and calling it out on social media. Where is the server? I want to know where is the server and what is the server saying? With that being said, all I can do is ask the question. My people came to me, Dan Coats came to me and some others, they said they think it's Russia. I have President Putin; he just said it's not Russia. I will say this: I don't see any reason why it would be. But I really do want to see the server.

But I have -- I have confidence in both parties. I -- I really believe that this will probably go on for a while, but I don't think it can go on without finding out what happened to the server. What happened to the servers of the Pakistani gentleman that worked on the DNC? Where are those servers? They're missing; where are they? What happened to Hillary Clinton's e-mails? 33,000 e-mails gone -- just gone. I think in Russia they wouldn't be gone so easily. I think it's a disgrace that we can't get Hillary Clinton's 33,000 e-mails. So I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today.

Yeah-- asked about Russian meddling, he immediately goes to Hillary’s emails. Yes, he really did that. And said he believes "both sides." He believes Putin as much as his own hand-picked intelligence community. Apparently he believes Putin is more truthful than our own intelligence experts.

You can interpret this however you want. But I’ll be honest. Before today, I kinda figured the idea of kompromat and Russian blackmail of Trump were just conspiracies. Now, I’m not so sure. Because I can’t really conjure up any other reason for our President to act so ass-kissing to a dictator such as Putin.

Believe what you want. But if you aren’t wondering, just a little bit, if Trump is either compromised, stupid, senile, unstable, or all of the above, then maybe Trump really could shoot a guy on 5th Avenue, and I’m pretty sure you’d still be Ok with him.

2033

He fumbled in his pocket, for the umpteenth time, feeling for the switch. He knew it was there of course. Yet he liked the touch of it in his hand-the way it made him feel. Strong. Powerful. For once. After all these years. After all he had been through. He was finally going to change things. What a feeling.

His mind went back. Fifteen years. It seemed like a lifetime, which it was mostly. He had only been 8 at the time. But he could remember. He never forgot. He felt the pain all over again. The journey, the long journey; a way out of the misery they were in. He and his mother and his little sister Mia. It took them months. And it was horrible. They were beaten and robbed many times along the way. Miserable. But his mother just kept telling them “When we get there, we’ll have a good life again. I’ll get a real job, you will go to school, you’ll learn all about the world. And you’ll grow up in a good place. Just wait.”

When they arrived at the border and saw the stars and stripes, his mother cried-they had finally made it. But something went wrong. His mother had said they would seek asylum, that the Americans were good, generous, and rich people, and that they would help them.

But it wasn’t to be. They never even got to ask. They weren’t allowed close to what his mother had called a “port of entry.” A big mean guy in a uniform had kept them away. So they waited. And waited. For days. When they finally made a dash for it, more mean guys in uniforms caught them, and took them away. As the mean guys pulled him away from his mother and Mia, his mother kept yelling “Be strong. I’ll find you.”

But she never did. He was taken to a “detention center” with a bunch of other boys. They were all told they’d see their families soon, but that never happened. Instead he was sent to a foster home. Then another. Then a few more stops. Finally, the Americans sent him back home. Without his family. Where he knew absolutely nobody. He had no idea what had happened to his mother and Mia. Were they living happily in America somewhere? He didn’t believe that. These Americans were not the good generous people his mother had believed in. They had said they wanted to "make America great again.” Apparently that meant they didn’t care about him. Or his family. Or anybody except themselves. Some of his foster parents seemed like nice people. But mostly, Americans were cruel. He didn’t know where his family was, but he knew nothing good had happened. Were they even alive? Probably not.

No matter though. For 15 long years, his whole life had been building to this point. The months in the “detention center,” the trip back to his homeland, the years on the street, the gangs, the drugs. But always, through all that, the hate. The Americans had taken away his mother, and sister. And they would, finally pay for that.

He looked around him. His mother had been right about one thing. The Americans WERE rich. As they went about their lives all around him, they seemed to be completely unaware how good they had it-and how bad others had it. There was a man over there, just reading in the shade, seeming not a care in the world. Off to the right, there was a teenage couple completely absorbed in each other. There was a woman walking her dogs. And over there was a young family- a mother and her son and daughter-just like what his family had once been, except much richer. Everyone seemed so happy.

And he hated every one of them. They all had it so good, and didn’t seem to care about anyone else. They didn’t care what America had done to him. They didn’t care what had happened to his mother. Or Mia. So he hated them. And if he was honest with himself, he hated almost everyone. Except the one man who had understood him, had talked to him like he meant something, who listened to him. And who had given him this vest. He had been assured that he wouldn’t feel a thing, that it would be quick, and it would be over. And many Americans would feel his pain. For once.

This isn’t what he wanted to do. He wanted to find his family again; somehow put his life back together. Live a normal life. But he knew that wasn’t going to happen. He tried to imagine, one last time, what it would be like to live a happy life. But that had been taken away all those years back when they took his mother and sister. His chance for a happy life came to an end that day. And the people around him, so happy and carefree--theirs would end today.

Today. Right now. He felt the switch one last time.

And he squeezed.

Baby Boomers?

Boomers. We were the generation that wanted to change the world. We wouldn’t accept the status quo. We rebelled against “the establishment.” We hated the war--we got political, we protested, some even died trying to stop it. And stop it we did. It took a while, and there were lots of reasons, but we helped.

It wasn’t just the war. We marched for civil rights as well. Guys grew their hair. Girls burned their bras, hippies got high, and the whole generation brought us rock and roll. We had marches, sit-ins, and boycotts. We protested anything we thought needed changing. Hell, in junior high we even boycotted the school cafeteria.

We were the generation that was going to change the world.

And we did. We made the world better. We fought hard and achieved great things.

So why did we stop?

Back then, we were so progressive. Not progressive as in being Democrats, but progressive in that we were trying to change things. Those causes were all things our un-hip parents yelled at us for. Yet now, few boomers identify as progressive. For good or bad, we’ve changed. We’ve become our parents. We’ve become the establishment.

Recently I was reading the comments on a Fox News site, relating to students staging a school walkout to protest gun violence. Boomers are the largest demographic of Fox News viewers, so I can be pretty sure that many of the comments came from boomers.

And the comments? Things like:

• If that were my kid, I’d drag him out by his hair. 
• Bunch of punks. They’re so stupid. They don’t even know the right names of the weapons.
• Go back to school. Study and get a job.
• Lazy, entitled snowflakes, that’s what they are.
• Where are their parents? Why aren’t they disciplining them?
• What? Did they run out of Tide Pods?
• I hope they get suspended.

You get the idea.

These people, many of them boomers, all sounded like “the establishment” in the 60’s. The establishment that  told us Martin Luther King Jr., was just a troublemaker. Or said “Cassius Clay” was a traitor. Or that Watergate was a witch hunt. Or that yes, war was hell, but we really gotta kill those commies. Or even that the Beatles were nothing--and they need to get their hair cut.

I don’t care if you think these students’ ideas are right are wrong. That’s not the point. You don’t have to agree with the protests of these kids to respect that they’re trying to make a difference. After years of boomers complaining that “kids nowadays” only care about their phones, how refreshing it is to see this generation wake up. So disagree with their stances if you want, but celebrate that they are trying to change the world.

That’s more than most of us boomers are doing now.

Social Media, Listen to Your Mom

I really don’t get it. Social media I mean. Why is the goal to just get people mad?

I mean really. Maybe my mom was different. But I know she always told me not to call other people names. Not to say nasty things, and try not to hurt other people’s feelings. And to treat them like I wanted to be treated.

I’m guessing most moms told their kids that. But lots and lots either didn’t hear it, or are just ignoring it.

It’s cool now to call people names. Whether it’s “libtards” or “Cheeto-head” or any of a million others, it doesn’t matter. Even if they do it to you! Mom would say: just don’t do it. And it never gets you anywhere. It just pisses off the people you’re having the discussion with.

Which of course is what they want. (Why, I don’t know.) They want to get other people mad. It’s their whole goal. And they love it, so much so they even convince themselves they’ve done it, when they’re actually not even close. I had what I thought was a discussion the other day on Facebook. The poster put something I didn’t agree with, and I pointed out the factual inaccuracies. (I do that, you know.) To which the poster replied something about “so I see you’re all upset over this.” I’m not sure how calling out lies comes across as upset. But I guess it does when that’s the whole goal.

Really, I don’t understand. Thecla Morgan, if she were still alive, would be pretty mad at me if I behaved like that.

Mom also told me not to lie. She pushed that one real hard. So I try not to. Now I’m not perfect, but I try to only post things that I am pretty sure are factual. Sometimes I get it wrong, and when I do, if you tell me and provide evidence, I’ll thank you for it. Of course I’m talking about facts, not opinions. You may not agree with my opinions or conclusions, but that doesn’t mean either of us are lying.

But when I point out lies to most people, they don’t thank me. And they don’t take the post down either. Normally they just get pissed off at me and call me names. (“Boy, I bet you feel all great and superior now, don’t you”) Or something like that. Stupid me, I figure most people want to tell the truth...

I have a lot of flaws. I know that. But I try to remember what mom said to me.

I don’t have an answer, other than listen to your mom, and do what she told you. And if she wasn’t as fair, honest, and decent as my mom, then you’re living life with a handicap. And I’m genuinely sorry.

Guns Gone Wild

With the recent school shooting, this is THE topic in the news and on social media. And I’ve noticed something about most opinions: they are just that--opinions, based on little or no data, and sometimes, no sense. Most people are discussing solutions, yet they don’t know the cause of the problem. It is clear that America has significantly more gun violence than other similar countries. (Sources here, here, and here.) Agreeing on that is actually the easiest part. What to do about it is, of course, a different story.

A word of warning however-while mass shootings are horrific and news-grabbing, they are only a very small part of the gun violence problem America has. So to find a solution, or even identify the problem, we have to look at the entire gun issue, not just mass shootings.

But before we try a fix, we have to find the cause. Let me explain. And I’m sorry, but this is going to sound a little like a science class! Pretend instead of trying to find a way to minimize gun violence, we are trying to find a way to minimize lung cancer. What we would do, (and what was done, of course) is that we would look at large groups of people who have lung cancer, and those that don’t. And we would try to find what is different between those groups. If I thought that chewing gum caused lung cancer, but we found out that both groups chewed gum in about the same amounts, I would have to eliminate gum chewing as a possible cause. No matter how much I wished one way or the other.

This is what so many people are NOT doing about guns. In the last week or so, I’ve heard all the following as causes for our gun violence problem: mental health issues, video games, drugs, bad parenting, lack of fathers in the home, movies, the media, abortions, phones, lack of discipline in our society, rap music, too many trophies, Facebook, bullying, removing God from our society, MTV, no discipline in school…

Some of these are foolish, but some make a lot of sense. And while many of these may be contributing factors, it’s doubtful that any of them are major causes. Because they all have a serious flaw. All of these issues are also issues in most other similar countries. Countries similar to the US all have mental health issues, video games, etc, yet they don’t have the same degree of gun violence. So while these factors may contribute, they can no more be THE cause of America’s gun violence problem than chewing gum is the cause of lung cancer. No matter how much we wish otherwise. It doesn’t mean we ignore these things; certainly addressing them could help. But it does mean we have to look further at causes.

Instead we have to look for something that is different between America and the other countries, just like we look at what’s different between groups with lung cancer and without lung cancer. While I'm sure there are more, there are three that have been suggested, and that make sense to me:

1. Americans are just different from people from other countries. 
2. We have the second amendment.
3. We have way, way, more guns.

If we’re really going to address our gun violence issues, we have to address these three. Because these are how we ARE different from countries with less gun violence.

But #1 and #2 both contribute to #3. Yes, Americans love guns, so we have more of them. Yes, America has the second amendment, again contributing to the number of guns in the country.

So like it or not, boiled all down, the one thing that makes us different from the rest of the world, comparing us to similar countries, is that simply, we have a lot more guns.

But that’s the easy part. Solutions? Much tougher. I’ll focus on some possibilities next time.

Let’s Not Be Stupid

America’s problems right now are not because of laws we pass. They are not because of health care, gun violence, or even Donald Trump. These, and many more, are symptoms. I will discuss some of those problems soon. But here I’d like to point out some underlying reasons.

1. We, as a public, have given up on critical thinking. We just believe what we want to believe.
2. We have allowed ourselves to put blind, unquestioning faith in certain leaders.
3. We have put party above all else--yes, even above country.
4. Honesty and integrity mean nothing.

       None of this is normal, and none of this is good.

Let me stress #1, since it actually leads to the other three: We have given up on critical thinking; we make and accept arguments that make no logical sense. We take positions that are against all scientific conclusions and reasoning.  We don’t care if we are right. We only care that we win the argument, using any “facts” we want, even if they might be wrong.

And while I say “we” I don’t mean all Americans. But it seems like many, maybe most of us.

For starters, I have a few examples here, all from just the last week. These trouble me. Not because I don’t agree with them. But because they just plain don’t make sense. Notice that these examples affect right-leaning stories. I see things like this on the left as well. But no matter how much I try to say “both sides,” right now it’s much worse on the right. Even the National Review, a very conservative publication concurs. Feel free to disagree. Here they are:

1) The FBI didn’t follow up on the Florida shooter because it was too busy with the Russia inquiry.
The FBI has over 35,000 agents. No intelligent person should believe that they can’t do two investigations at once.

2) We need weapons to protect ourselves from the government.
If the US military came after you, with all their advanced weaponry, do you really think your AR-15 would save you? Think about that honestly. You know you wouldn’t have a chance. Or maybe you think you should be allowed to own any weapon, like a nuclear bomb.

3) David Hogg, the student from Florida talking about gun laws is a not a student, but a paid actor.
When I saw this, I didn’t jump on it. I waited till I heard word from the school superintendent, as well as reporting of articles about this student from his school paper over the last 6 months. Think about this: if he didn’t attend school there, don’t you think the actual school kids would figure that out?

It used to be just conspiracy nuts saying this kind of stuff. No more. I’ve seen these stories and more on Facebook from people who supposedly are “reasonable people.”

These are easily proven wrong. But even when they are, people refuse to believe the proof, calling it “fake news.” They keep believing the story.  Or maybe they don’t believe the story, but they keep repeating it anyway. I’m not sure which is worse. But I know that truth means nothing. And this is destroying us.

It is interesting to note that, a week out, all agree that David Hogg is, indeed, a student. But the credibility of all those who said otherwise hasn’t suffered. Their followers don’t care that they were lied to. They’ll keep believing and spreading their lies.

I remember in the early days of the internet, I (foolishly) thought. “From now on, nobody will be able to lie or spread propaganda. All we have to do is search for the information ourselves.” I assumed that all people wanted to be truthful, wanted to know the truth. I find now, people are more interested in making arguments for their “side.”  This saddens and troubles me. I want truth, not stories that reinforce my opinions. And you should too.

I don’t know how we move forward in truth, if truth doesn’t matter.

My next article will show how this thinking affects one issue particularly.

Previous blog in this series: What Can We Do?

What Can We Do?

For the very first time in my life, I am worried about America. I’ve just seen too many things happen recently. Mass shootings, Russian interference, the ignoring of climate change, the trashing of our environment in the name of “cutting regulations,” heartless executive actions, our increased lack of respect in the world, the breakdown of how congress works (or doesn’t), many many scandals in the White House, the normalization of gas-lighting and lying, and about a million more.

But those things honestly are not what worry me. No, most of those problems are “up there” in Washington, or someplace far away from me. Politicians will always be assholes. But I’ve always had confidence that Americans will recognize the BS and vote them out. But no more. No, I'm surprised by the large number of normal people who either don’t care about those things, or even more amazingly, actively support them. Or maybe don’t even know about them because of the limited one-sided news they consume.

In any crisis, we basically have two choices: try to make a difference and change it (fight), or just accept it, hope for the best, and try to stay sane (chill). Neither one of those choices is the “right” choice. It depends on who you are, and what you have the power to do.

Some complain when athletes or actors talk about their political or social beliefs. But I understand it. Most of us don’t have much of a stage. We’re pretty unknown. But let’s take LeBron or Chuck Norris. They have a stage, and they choose to use it. Not because they hate America. On the contrary, they talk about their beliefs because they love this country and they want to make it better. They could go the other way, of course. Like Tiger or Michael Jordan. Those two both pretty much avoid any kind of political or social statement. Neither way is “right.” But for me, I think I'm more LeBron than Tiger.

So what can we do? As for me, I’m a little old to run for congress, and I don’t think Marcy Kaptur is retiring any time soon. We all can vote, call our congressman… and most of us do those things. 

Or we can choose to put stuff on Facebook--which sometimes I do. That’s the biggest stage I have. But that normally just pisses people off. It rarely helps; many times it actually hurts.

The only thing I can think of, at least for now, is to put my thoughts in writing, in the hope that some people will read them and get to thinking. And to do so in a way that hopefully inspires thought, not anger. Without making fun of people's opinions, or belittling them in any way. I like to think that if I explain something well enough, it will be fodder for some people’s thoughts. Maybe it won't make any difference.  But hey, I can try.

So in the next few weeks, you’ll see things I’ve written. Most are about politics and the country, but there will be some on other topics, such as social media. I hope they’re read by many people, including those who disagree with me, or else really, what's the point? I hope you’ll find them fair, even if you don’t agree with me. I won’t put these writings on Facebook, but I will link to them there. And twitter as well. 

If you find them interesting or helpful, feel free to share them. If I find they’re getting read, I’ll keep it up. If not, well--nothing ventured, nothing lost, and I’ll move on to something else.

Look for them here. I’m old, not dead, and it would be great to make a difference. We’ll see.